------- Comment #7 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-01-30 15:51 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Did I understand this wrong ? Does the correct interpretation of the standard
> not allow for member-function-pointers as non-type arguments ?
It does, but it requires them to be in a constant-expression context -- i.e.
informally speaking the compiler needs to know *at compile time* which member
function you refer to. You can use a function argument as a template
argument.
I think this is indeed a duplicate of PR 37093.
W.
W.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37093 ***
--
bangerth at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bangerth at gmail dot com
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38681
