------- Comment #9 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-27 20:49 -------
Looks to me like the flipside of libstdc++/7439. More broadly speaking, C99
macros vs. C++98/0x. The current status on this issue is:
For 4.1/4.2/4.3/trunk, C99 macros should be visible with
1) -std=gnu99/c99 in "C" code (platform-specific if this is guarded: linux
is)
2) with _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_MATH defined for c++98/0x, macros are undefined and
templates scoped in namespace std:: are visible. The macro
_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_FP_MACROS_DYNAMIC can be defined to suppress this, and define
the macros.
This seems like standards-conformant behaviour is possible with the right
combination of defines. Sadly, this is not documented, and clearly need to be.
With documentation to explain this, I think this bug can be closed.
I am adding the keyword documentation to this bug and will take care of it in
the next documentation sweep.
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |documentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14608
