------- Comment #9 from tim at klingt dot org 2009-01-24 09:56 ------- > Hi tim, I extracted this test case from your website. But I can't exactly > reproduce this bug on my machine with a core2 quard micor processor. Can you > help me to check whether my test case is valid firstly? Here I post what I got > on my machine for your reference:
the benchmark test case looks fine. the times on my machine: gcc-4.2: t...@thinkpad:~/sandbox$ time ./a.out real 0m1.852s user 0m1.829s sys 0m0.010s t...@thinkpad:~/sandbox$ time ./a.out real 0m1.826s user 0m1.817s sys 0m0.002s t...@thinkpad:~/sandbox$ time ./a.out real 0m1.833s user 0m1.826s sys 0m0.001s gcc-4.3: time ./a.out real 0m2.062s user 0m2.047s sys 0m0.002s t...@thinkpad:~/sandbox$ time ./a.out real 0m2.061s user 0m2.043s sys 0m0.006s t...@thinkpad:~/sandbox$ time ./a.out real 0m2.101s user 0m2.053s sys 0m0.036s gcc-4.4 (20090111): t...@thinkpad:~/sandbox$ time ./a.out real 0m2.536s user 0m2.481s sys 0m0.017s t...@thinkpad:~/sandbox$ time ./a.out real 0m2.497s user 0m2.467s sys 0m0.003s t...@thinkpad:~/sandbox$ time ./a.out real 0m2.539s user 0m2.484s sys 0m0.036s best, tim -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38824
