------- Comment #4 from mrs at apple dot com 2009-01-24 04:22 ------- First, you didn't test 4.0.0, so all your reasoning is invalid. Second, claiming no ABI breakage when there is abi breakage is silly. I guess if you have no customers with no software, with do previously deployed software and you don't care about abi breakage, you can get away with it. Unfortunately, this doesn't apply in our case.
I'd rather you close this out as won't fix, if you can't be bothered to even actually check the abi of gcc-4.0.0 and compare it against 4.2.1, it is more honest. Closing it as invalid is wrong. :-( -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36173
