------- Comment #5 from j dot s dot sebastian at gmail dot com 2009-01-20
15:13 -------
It seems with libstdc++ from svn trunk the bug disappears.
Both
__gnu_parallel::sort(v.begin(), v.end());
and
__gnu_parallel::sort(v.begin(), v.end(),std::less<int>());
now compile and run.
At the moment I only succeeded in making it compile with -march=native (in 64
bit mode), but I think that looks like a totally unrelated issue with the way
i've setup the code from SVN.
So I guess we can close this bug.
--
j dot s dot sebastian at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38897
