------- Comment #3 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-19 22:18 ------- > > I suspect the following is invalid as the arguments to the defined > > assignment > > alias. > > > > Why do you think it is invalid? Because the arguments to the i_to_t (or l_to_t) alias. They point to the same data. I may be wrong however (actually it wouldn't be the first time when arguing about standard conformance). I'm sure it is wrong with basic subroutines, but mixing that with where, elemental and defined assignment doesn't make it clear.
> For what it's worth, the test case compiles > successfully with a different compiler. The larger program compiles with > several other compilers. And it compiles with gfortran too ;). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38863
