------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-31 01:40 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Reverting is a bad approach. We IMHO just want to check for > TREE_CODE (type) == REFERENCE_TYPE and issue diagnostics that references can't > be value-initialized.
Yes that seems like a better idea as we can give a better error message than before. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36695
