------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-25 01:05 ------- You still need a definition of X::VAL1, you only have a declaration of it.
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38624