------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-12 16:19 -------
I have the gut feeling that the program in comment 1 is valid, even though
gfortran, g95, ifort and NAG f95 reject it. See PR 38506.
Regarding the c_loc: I think that should be possible; I'm not 100% sure whether
there exists scenarios where it causes problems, but ad hoc I don't see any.
Patch:
--- resolve.c (Revision 142706)
+++ resolve.c
@@ -2165,7 +2165,7 @@ gfc_iso_c_func_interface (gfc_symbol *sy
if (args_sym->attr.dimension != 0
&& (args_sym->as && args_sym->as->rank == 0))
{
- gfc_error_now ("Allocatable variable '%s' used as a
"
+ gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_F2003, "Allocatable variable
'%s' used as a "
"parameter to '%s' at %L must not be
"
"an array of zero size",
args_sym->name, sym->name,
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36771
