------- Comment #5 from sabre at nondot dot org 2008-12-12 06:42 ------- That is a lot more clear. Thank you for the explanation Joseph! I agree with you that if you want this to be acceptable that the folded version of the operand is really what is interesting. That seems much trickier to model though.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38377
