------- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 10:55 ------- ?? libgcj_bc.so.1 isn't supposed to be a symlink to libgcj.so.10, but to libgcj_bc.so.1.0.0.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38396
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:57:27 -0800
------- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 10:55 ------- ?? libgcj_bc.so.1 isn't supposed to be a symlink to libgcj.so.10, but to libgcj_bc.so.1.0.0.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38396