For the attached code, there's no reason why the generated code at -O2 would
need an unused stack-slot (a second with -march=v10, a first with -march=v32)
when operand 5 (the last) of the asm is "g" than if it's "X". Using "X" seems
a little awkward life-time-wise because the input is supposed to be valid.
I don't see this oddness on the host with native 4.1.2 on the host,
with/without -m32.
--
Summary: odd extra unused stack space/register allocated with asm
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: cris-axis-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38350
