------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-28 21:26 -------
Confirmed. At least we could get (1) pointing to the correct location of co(i,
j) instead of at the end of the overall expression. I had to look twice to see
what was wrong. co is not the same as c0. o vs 0 :).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-11-28 21:26:16
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38312
