------- Comment #21 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-28 13:24 -------
(In reply to comment #20)
> I don't see ad hoc whether PR 35810 is the problem;
With this I get no ICE, and no valgrind error either. :-)
--- pr36463_12.f90 2008-11-28 15:03:07.000000000 +0100
+++ pr36463_12_works.f90 2008-11-28 15:02:15.000000000 +0100
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
do while(message(i) /= C_NULL_CHAR)
i = i+1
end do
+ allocate(my_message(i-1))
my_message = message(int(1,kind(i)):i-1)
gp = get_funloc(make_mess,aux)
end function gp
> if you close this PR, can
> you add a note to the PR that one should re-check PR 35971, comment 0 and PR
> 36463, comment 12 before closing? That way we are sure that the test case does
> not get lost, if PR 35810 does not fix the remaining issues.
>
I will do that.
We could as well add James' gptr as a test case for a procedure pointer PR
(there is probably one?). Then, I agree we can close this PR.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36463
