------- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-11-28 11:40
-------
... and I'm coming to the conclusion that this is not a bug in our library.
Consider the std::vector case: I cannot see anything wrong with using
std::uninitialized_copy in the implementation of the constructor. In turn, the
former does, per the Standard:
::new(static_cast<void*>(&*__cur)) typename
iterator_traits<_ForwardIterator>::value_type(*__first);
thus, the explicit constructor can be used.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38265
