------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-11-15 22:15 ------- Subject: Re: --enable-checking=all times out during bootstrap
Sent from my iPhone On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:59 PM, "edwintorok at gmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > ------- Comment #2 from edwintorok at gmail dot com 2008-11-15 > 21:59 ------- > (In reply to comment #1) >> Subject: Re: New: --enable-checking=all times out during bootstrap >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:27 PM, "edwintorok at gmail dot com" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> wrote: >> >>> I tried to build a gcc 4.4.0 with --enable-checking=all but it timed >>> out: >> >> Since --enable-checking=all enables gc all the time then yes >> It will take a long time. Maybe even days. Marking is expensive. >> > > Thanks, this is the 'gcac' flag, right? > Yes. > What if I build with > "assert,df,fold,rtl,misc,tree,gc,rtlflag,runtime", would > that build within a reasonable amount of time? Rtl checking is also expensive (no way near as expensive as gcac) but it does find real bugs in some cases. Everything else is enabled by default during development of the trunk. > > > And is it worth to build with more checking, than those enabled by > default? > [i.e. did that expose bugs in the past?] > > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38139 > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38139
