------- Comment #7 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-11 13:46 ------- Subject: Re: private/public confusion with a contained function
Hello, As best I can see, your reduction of the problem is not correct; in it subroutine S1 should be private, not public. Yours truly, Norm Clerman ---- jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #6 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-11-11 13:28 ------- > reduced: > > MODULE M1 > IMPLICIT NONE > PRIVATE > TYPE T1 > INTEGER :: I1 > END TYPE T1 > PUBLIC :: S1 > CONTAINS > SUBROUTINE S1 > CONTAINS > TYPE(T1) FUNCTION F1() > END FUNCTION F1 > END SUBROUTINE S1 > END MODULE M1 > > > -- > > jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > OtherBugsDependingO| |32834 > nThis| | > Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW > Ever Confirmed|0 |1 > Keywords| |rejects-valid > Known to fail| |4.4.0 > Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-11-11 13:28:28 > date| | > Summary|bug5 |private/public confusion > | |with a contained function > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38065 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38065
