------- Comment #6 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2008-11-11 15:22 ------- Sorry, Kaz. I missed this PR. I've just found it after Bernd's email.
I don't think it is a right solution or stable workaround. In fact all pseudos (551, 289, 288) involved in 2 wrong insns got different stack slots. It might be IRA triggered some latent bug in reload inheritence. Reload decided that r2 contains value of 551 (gf+4) but it contains gf+0 (pseudo 434 which died in prev insn 828). I'll look at this problem but taking reload complexity into account it will take a few days. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37514
