------- Comment #3 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-10 18:32 ------- > It might be that only number_of_iterations_lt_to_ne needs to be changed, > I looked at other uses of fold_build* in tree-ssa-loop-niter.c and quite > some others also look at least fishy (at least those generating compares), > but they usually only set assumptions, so they might be fine for now.
no, they could not. Any comparison of wrong-type operands is a problem. > In any case, this seems to work for me: Probably a more thorough fix of the type problems in tree-ssa-loop-niter.c would be better. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38070