------- Comment #2 from jason at redhat dot com 2008-10-16 18:22 -------
Subject: Re: DWARF output for inlined functions doesn't
always use DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine
xuepeng dot guo at intel dot com wrote:
> Hello Jason, I posted the whole debug_info section of of the binary file of
> your example as below. I guess you mean that DW_TAG_lexical_block tags like
> those at <8c> and <8d> are unnecessary. We should avoid generating them if
> they
> contain nothing. Am I right?
No; they aren't empty, they contain a couple of variables. But they
come from an inlined function ("third"), and we shouldn't represent
inlined functions in the debug info for the abstract instance of an
inline function.
Jason
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37801
