------- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2008-10-13 08:44 
-------
Apparently the other library doesn't implement the resolution of DR 109 (if I
comment out the additional operator() the code compiles). In any case, there
are very long standing issues with those facilities, which will be deprecated
in C++0x (we already moved the code to include/backward/) and replaced by bind.


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
          Component|c++                         |libstdc++
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37811

Reply via email to