------- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-10-13 08:44 ------- Apparently the other library doesn't implement the resolution of DR 109 (if I comment out the additional operator() the code compiles). In any case, there are very long standing issues with those facilities, which will be deprecated in C++0x (we already moved the code to include/backward/) and replaced by bind.
-- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c++ |libstdc++ Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37811