------- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-09 09:15 ------- (In reply to comment #1)
> &NAMLIS > A(1)%M = 1, > A(1)%N = 5, > A(2)%M = 2, > A(2)%N = 6, > A(3)%M = 5, > A(3)%N = 99 > / Tobias, should A(3)%M not be 89?? Jerry, I think that your namelist_54.f90 should test the values of A(3) as well as A(1) and A(2) Cheers Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37707