The following code results in an error when optimized using -O2 or -O3 flag,
but works fine with -O1. I've also been able to "confuse" the optimizer by
adding some code just after or before the line "iX += pA2->iX;" but I'm not
sure how safe that method is.

---------------------- Full code starts here ----------------------

#include <iostream>

class A
{
  private:
    int32_t iX;

  public:
    explicit A(int x) : iX(x) {}

  public:
    A& operator*=(const A& a);

  public:
                int32_t getX() const { return iX; }
};

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

A& A::operator*=(const A& B)
{
  const A* pA2 = &B;

  int iBothSigns = 0;
  if (iX >= 0 && pA2->iX >= 0)
  {
    iBothSigns = 1;
  }
  else if (iX < 0 && pA2->iX < 0)
  {
    iBothSigns = -1;
  }

  iX += pA2->iX;

  if (iX >= 0 && iBothSigns == -1) // Expected
  {
                std::cout << "OK" << std::endl;
    return *this;
  }
  else if (iX < 0 && iBothSigns == 1) // Not expected
  {
                std::cout << "Unexpected" << std::endl;
    return *this;
  }
        std::cout << "Error" << std::endl;

  return *this;
}

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

int main()
{
        A n1(-2147483648);
        A n2(-2147483648);

        std::cout << "1: expected -2147483648, got " << n1.getX() << std::endl;
        std::cout << "2: expected -2147483648, got " << n2.getX() << std::endl;
        n1 *= n2;
        std::cout << "3: expected previous line to be OK" << std::endl;
        return 0;
}

---------------------- end of code ----------------------

---------------------- compiler output ----------------------

g++ -o bugreport.o -c -v -Wall -O3 -pedantic -ansi -save-temps bugreport.cpp
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,treelang --prefix=/usr
--enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib
--without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2 --program-suffix=-4.2
--enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-objc-gc --enable-mpfr
--enable-targets=all --enable-checking=release --build=i486-linux-gnu
--host=i486-linux-gnu --target=i486-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)
 /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/cc1plus -E -quiet -v -D_GNU_SOURCE
bugreport.cpp -mtune=generic -ansi -Wall -pedantic -O3 -fpch-preprocess -o
bugreport.ii
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include/i486-linux-gnu"
ignoring nonexistent directory
"/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/../../../../i486-linux-gnu/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/include/i486-linux-gnu"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
 /usr/include/c++/4.2
 /usr/include/c++/4.2/i486-linux-gnu
 /usr/include/c++/4.2/backward
 /usr/local/include
 /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/include
 /usr/include
End of search list.
 /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.2.3/cc1plus -fpreprocessed bugreport.ii -quiet
-dumpbase bugreport.cpp -mtune=generic -ansi -auxbase-strip bugreport.o -O3
-Wall -pedantic -ansi -version -fstack-protector -fstack-protector -o
bugreport.s
GNU C++ version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7) (i486-linux-gnu)
        compiled by GNU C version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=99 --param ggc-min-heapsize=129349
Compiler executable checksum: 9cf91ba46d80e564052e4fbab0d6561b
bugreport.cpp:55: warning: this decimal constant is unsigned only in ISO C90
bugreport.cpp:56: warning: this decimal constant is unsigned only in ISO C90
 as --traditional-format -V -Qy -o bugreport.o bugreport.s
GNU assembler version 2.18.0 (i486-linux-gnu) using BFD version (GNU Binutils
for Ubuntu) 2.18.0.20080103
g++ -o bugreport bugreport.o


-- 
           Summary: C++ over-eager optimization when working with a pointer
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: jrenggli at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37685

Reply via email to