------- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-09-06 16:58 ------- Note that before the patch for pr35837, the code in comment #1 was wrongly rejected. This is now fixed by this patch. Also if the FORALL statement is this code is uncommented, it is now accepted while it is invalid, see pr37398.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389
