------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2008-08-29 16:39 ------- Subject: Re: New: bad code generation with enum and -m32
This code is undefined as the value of 32 is outside the range of the enum. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 29, 2008, at 9:29, "gmorin1 at bloomberg dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > This is a copy of a Debian report that I made (I thought I might as > well report > it directly here too): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496965 > > g++ generates bad code for this program on an amd64 machine. It > works with > fine in 64-bit and with older versions of gcc. > > #include <stdlib.h> > struct MyTypes { > enum Type { > NOVALUE = 1, > VALUE = 30, > VALUE2 = 31, > VALUE3 = -3 > }; > > static bool isValue(MyTypes::Type value); > }; > > bool MyTypes::isValue(MyTypes::Type value) > { > switch (value) { > case MyTypes::VALUE: > case MyTypes::VALUE2: > case MyTypes::VALUE3: { > return true; > } > default: { > return false; > } > } > } > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > { > if (true == MyTypes::isValue(MyTypes::Type(32))) { > abort(); > } > return 0; > } > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ g++ -m32 -Wall -o e enumtest.cpp > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./e > Aborted > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ g++ -Wall -o e enumtest.cpp > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./e > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ g++-4.2 -m32 -Wall -o e enumtest.cpp > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./e > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ g++-4.1 -m32 -Wall -o e enumtest.cpp > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./e > > It works with -O2 though (not -O1): > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ g++ -O2 -m32 -Wall -o e enumtest.cpp > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./e > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: lenny/sid > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > > -- > Summary: bad code generation with enum and -m32 > Product: gcc > Version: 4.3.1 > Status: UNCONFIRMED > Severity: normal > Priority: P3 > Component: c++ > AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org > ReportedBy: gmorin1 at bloomberg dot net > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37281 > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37281