------- Comment #4 from jay dot krell at cornell dot edu 2008-08-17 08:51 ------- Subject: RE: cannot find -lgcc_s
Let's dissect the output a bit: Word wrap plus laziness => I didn't look closely before. -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/4.3.1 -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/4.3.1 -L/obj/gcc.1/sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/./ld -L/usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/4.3.1 -L/usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/4.3.1/../../../../sparc64-sunsolaris2.10/lib/sparcv9 -L/usr/local/sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sys-root/lib/sparcv9 -L/usr/local/sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sys-root/usr/lib/sparcv9 -L/usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/4.3.1/../../../../sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/lib -L/usr/local/sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sys-root/lib -L/usr/local/sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/sys-root/usr/lib vs. the workaround: Directory = Prefix + "/lib/gcc/sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/" + GccVersion Run(".", "mkdir -p " + Directory) Run(Directory, "-ln -s sparcv9/libgcc_s.so libgcc_s.so") Run(Directory, "-ln -s sparcv9/libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1") Therefore: The "biarch" paths are not being applied to the "gcc .libs" paths. /usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/4.3.1 but not /usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc64-sun-solaris2.10/4.3.1/sparcv9 both for -Wl,-rpath and -L. This IS reasonable, since the tools were built with -disable-multilib, BUT the .libs were in fact put in sparcv9 -- at least the .so files. (I find all the dot-dots a pain to read! I understand relocatable, and symlinks, but still..) They are being applied to the "system .libs" paths. sys-root/lib/sparcv9 and sys-root/usr/lib/sparcv9. Could be that .so file placement is not so flexible? Because they aren't really supposed to be placed here anyway? You know, it is very up to me where to place .a files, but .so files maybe more important to adhere to strict standards, since they are used at runtime? Also not shown is -enable-version-specific-runtimes or such, whatever I saw Cygwin using. It SEEMS the fix is now almost obvious. That multilib suffixes need to be applied to more prefixes. Or alter the directory structure otherwise, via configure. I should also try without -enable-rpath I guess. Thank you for attention to the bug, - Jay > Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 22:36:55 +0000 > Subject: [Bug bootstrap/37079] cannot find -lgcc_s > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-16 22:36 > ------- > What happens if you just use --with-build-sysroot= ? without saying the > --with-sysroot? > > > -- > > pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Component|c |bootstrap > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37079 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37079