------- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-29 15:07 ------- Not a duplicate, not fixed; the testcases are just xfailed. This PR deals with the valid new T[n](), whereas 2123 deals with the invalid new T[n](init).
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11309