------- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-07-29 15:07 -------
Not a duplicate, not fixed; the testcases are just xfailed.  This PR deals with
the valid new T[n](), whereas 2123 deals with the invalid new T[n](init).


-- 

jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11309

Reply via email to