------- Comment #10 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-27 15:37
-------
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] STORAGE_ERROR raised compiling s-os_lib.adb
No, it doesn't.
Even if the op isn't hashed, it is still compared for in
vn_reference_op_eq, so at worst the non-hashing will make it compare
more vn_reference_op's than it has to, it shouldn't affect
correctness.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 5:16 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-27 09:16
> -------
> This points to an immediate problem in vn_reference_op_compute_hash:
>
> /* Compute the hash for a reference operand VRO1. */
>
> static hashval_t
> vn_reference_op_compute_hash (const vn_reference_op_t vro1)
> {
> return iterative_hash_expr (vro1->op0, vro1->opcode)
> + iterative_hash_expr (vro1->op1, vro1->opcode);
> }
>
> op2 is not hashed (whereas it is on the 4.3 branch).
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36830
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36830
