------- Comment #2 from rlblaster at gmail dot com 2008-06-21 16:45 ------- Ah, sorry, my bad. I was overindexing at the line of arr[i] = prefix_sz % 5;
The behaviour just seemed too odd to me. Sorry for the inconvenience! -- rlblaster at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36565