------- Comment #22 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-14 07:25 ------- (In reply to comment #20) > I do like your PR33781.diff patch which moves us in the right direction. > Is it possible/safe to apply similar voodoo to the libgcc.map rule?
I suppose the same is necessary for the libgcc_s$(SHLIB_EXT) rule. Any other rules? I guess using an options @FILE will be easiest to get around the limit here. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33781
