------- Comment #9 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-12 14:51 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] ICE in compute_antic
The assert is there because often when people break PRE, it goes into infinite loops due to non-convergence, and eats all memory and CPU very very very quickly. It is much easier to debug the assert and see the assert than have your system become unusable until OOM happens. :) It is bogus in the sense that the number of iterations should be some factor of the loop depth, rather than 50. I'm torn as to whether we should set it to whatever our reasonable maximum of loop depth is, or remove it or comment it out. On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:41 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-12 14:41 > ------- > I guess the assert is just bogus. But of course maybe Danny wants to have a > look? > > > -- > > rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot > | |org > GCC target triplet|ppc-linux | > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36508 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36508
