------- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-31 09:17 -------
Ok, apparently rev. 136130 *did* in fact also fix the test case in comment #1
(although I somehow assumed otherwise), and therefore this whole PR is fixed.
Should I add another test case with an assumed shape array (or simply change
proc_decl_12.f90 to have an assumed shape instead of an explicit shape array)?
Or is proc_decl_12.f90 enough as it is?
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2008-04-06 12:44:34 |2008-05-31 09:17:07
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35830
