------- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-14 23:24
-------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Patch by FX:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg00546.html
>
> My review:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-03/msg00232.html
Your second point in the review is spot on, the patch is certainly not doing
the right thing (the trans-expr.c part, at least) :(
I've spent some time looking into other options, but this is all too confusing:
I wonder if we shouldn't have made these derived types into structures all the
way, instead of trying to morph things into pointer types when comes code
generation.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |
|patches/2008- |
|03/msg00546.html |
Keywords|patch |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34199
