------- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:38 -------
Right, this is really as intended, to avoid too many false positives.
The warning circuitry is not prepared to handle more complex cases,
which would require really a different kind of tool, so is out of the scope
of the front-end.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35464
