------- Comment #20 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-03 14:07 ------- (In reply to comment #19) > I had none, but now I wrote a very basic one, which misses several checks and > gives false positives. I put the Perl script at > http://physik.fu-berlin.de/~tburnus/tmp/check_po
FX, I think we should also audit the other PO files, what do you think? > Remaining problems found using my just created script: > msgid Unable to resolve the specific function '%s' at %L Sorry, I was using the old *.po file for testing. This is fixed in the new PO file. The %< vs. < is still valid, but it should not cause any crash. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36103
