------- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-17 01:35 ------- I failed to take care of the equivalent problem for eoshift. Here is a case from Dick on this. I have a patch testing.
SUBROUTINE RA0072(DDA,LDA,nf10,nf1,mf1,nf2) ! fails on Windows XP ! gcc version 4.4.0 20080312 (experimental) [trunk revision 133139] !compile time seq fault REAL DDA(10,10) LOGICAL LDA(10,10) WHERE (LDA) DDA = eoSHIFT(DDA,1,1.0,-MF1) END SUBROUTINE -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35724