------- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-17 01:35 
-------
I failed to take care of the equivalent problem for eoshift.  Here is a case
from Dick on this.  I have a patch testing.

     SUBROUTINE RA0072(DDA,LDA,nf10,nf1,mf1,nf2)
! fails on Windows XP
! gcc version 4.4.0 20080312 (experimental) [trunk revision 133139]
!compile time seq fault

      REAL DDA(10,10)
      LOGICAL LDA(10,10)

      WHERE (LDA) DDA = eoSHIFT(DDA,1,1.0,-MF1)

      END SUBROUTINE


-- 

jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35724

Reply via email to