------- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-12 10:33 ------- > Where are we at with the J3 discussion?
Sun requested a formal interpretation: http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2008-March/001207.html Read on there. At some point there will be a formal reply by J3; if textual changes are needed, it will go through WG5 and ISO. Snapshot: - Bob of Sun: Thinks it should be valid according the intent of the standard, but it is invalid by words of the standard - Bill of Cray: Thinks it is invalid (and no exception should be added) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35476
