------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-09 18:49 -------
> In this test case both arrays are explicit-sized, and even have the same size,
> but their upper and lower bounds are shifted. gfortran currently does not even
> check if both arrays have the same size, only their ranks are compared.
I think procedures with explicit-shape arguments with the same shape/size but
only different bounds should be conformable.
The only real problem is assumed-shape vs. the rest (explict, assumed-size,
...). Ok, if an explicit size is given, the sizes should match, but arguments
of the dummy/actual function like "integer :: foo(*)" and bar(1:2) and
foobar(3000:3001) should all be conformable.
Similarly, I think, also foo(1:), bar(:) and foobar(-300:) should be
conformable.
(I cannot really pinpoint it in the standard, but I'm convinced that this is
the case; when I have time, I will re-read the standard and try to produce a
proper reference.)
* I use "manner" as "kind" and "type" have a special Fortran meaning.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-04-09 18:49:31
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35831
