------- Comment #5 from Georg dot Baum at post dot rwth-aachen dot de 2008-03-31 19:41 ------- Subject: Re: return type of complex functions not C compatible
> ------- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-30 21:18 ------- > > Not all. I gave two counter examples: pvf and ifort. > > Well at least ifort 9.1, 10.0 and 10.1 on Linux do not use the f2c calling > convention. It does not use __, but apart from that it handles complex valued functions in the same way as f2c and g77. Try it out if you don't believe. In terms of gfortran command line options: If you want gfortran to behave like ifort, use gfortran -ff2c -fno-second-underscore I have to admit that I don't know how ifort handles real valued functions, so it is possible that the above command breaks compatibility with ifort for real valued functions. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35765
