------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-25 21:12 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > To put the "weird setup" into perspective: The naive user in me expects > make cc1 & > make ada.pdf
And if someone does: make cc1 & make cc1plus They will run into the same issue with respect of .o/.s files not being atomically created either. So I don't see why we should treat -MF any different from any other output file. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35697
