------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-24 21:35 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Does this mean that it is correct that no assigment takes place?
So what is happening is that next[0] returns a reference and that reference goes invalid when next.push_back(-1) gets called. So the assignment happens, just to the wrong place :). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35686
