------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-23 00:48 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I've applied a patch that should fix this. No-one's confirmed > whether it does though, so I'm marking the PR as waiting.
And I just confirmed, it does fix it, on powerpc64-darwin: --- old.s 2008-03-22 17:47:53.000000000 -0700 +++ new.s 2008-03-22 17:47:18.000000000 -0700 @@ -24,22 +24,15 @@ _test2: stw r0,-4(r1) oris r0,r0,0xc000 mtspr 256,r0 - li r0,48 - li r9,64 - vaddfp v2,v2,v2 - addi r2,r1,16 - addi r11,r1,48 + vaddfp v0,v2,v2 + addi r2,r1,48 lwz r12,-4(r1) - vaddfp v3,v3,v3 - stvx v2,0,r11 - stvx v3,r2,r0 - lvx v0,0,r11 - lvx v1,r2,r0 - addi r2,r1,-128 - stvx v0,r2,r0 - stvx v1,r2,r9 - lvx v2,r2,r0 - lvx v3,r2,r9 + vaddfp v1,v3,v3 + vor v2,v0,v0 + vor v3,v1,v1 + stvx v0,0,r2 + addi r2,r1,64 + stvx v1,0,r2 mtspr 256,r12 blr .subsections_via_symbols Thanks for the fix Richard. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33927