------- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-21 00:16 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > > > Any chance, you'll revert the offending patch? > > > > The patch fixed a wrong-code PR, so by reverting the patch, we would > introduce a wrong-code regression. I think it would be better to see what > the underlying issue is for FreeBSD, then fix that.
Your first sentence is also illogical. gfortran 4.2 and 4.3 work fine on FreeBSD. This patch breaks gfortran on FreeBSD. It is therefore a regression. The patch should be reverted and the wrong-code PR re-opened. You can't have a regression within trunk. If I understood Jerry correctly on IRC, the committed code actually addresses 3 independent issues, which makes it rather hard for me to undo only portions of what was committed because I don't know which parts address which problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35632
