------- Comment #12 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-14 11:28 ------- (In reply to comment #11)
> Actually, the test produces different results for 32bit vs 64bit targets. Are you sure you don't mean 32 vs 64-bit *hosts*? My cris-elf (32-bit target) autotester runs on a x86_64 F8, and it tells me that between 133196:133207 these regressions were introduced, coincident with jvdelisle's changes and that there were no non-testsuite changes in this range: gcc.sum gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-4.c gfortran.sum gfortran.dg/ldist-1.f90 and gcc.log and fortran.log says: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-4.c scan-tree-dump-times ldist "distributed: split to 2 loops" 1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/ldist-1.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times ldist "distributed: split to 5 loops" 1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35406
