------- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-03-13 17:02 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] spurious exceptions with -ffloat-store
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-13 17:00 > ------- > I think this patch causes invalid gimple to show up at -O0 . With my patches > to detect invalid gimple shows that there are a lot of failures with complex > and -O0. Did the definition of what is valid gimple for complex at -O0 > change? No. I also recognized that we still set DECL_IS_GIMPLE_REG but is_gimple_reg says it is not. We should go into SSA for -O0 as well and fix this for real. Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33088
