------- Comment #11 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-03-07 07:06 ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Created an attachment (id=15276) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15276&action=view) [edit] > Updated patch to disallow TFmode and TDmode from reg+reg addressing > > Here is an updated patch that not only fixes the bootstrap issue, but also > fixes a regression of the vect-64.c test case, both of which were being caught > by the new gcc_assert added by Joseph.
Is there a reason why you don't use GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) != N in the expression? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35373
