------- Comment #49 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-23 19:00 
-------
To fix this completely, a little bit more work is required to check what should
be done for nanl(), which is not handled by current patch. (I don't have time
to look into it.) For more information, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg01035.html


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
                   |org                         |dot org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
      Known to fail|4.2.0 4.3.0 4.4.0           |4.2.0 4.3.0
      Known to work|                            |4.4.0
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25477

Reply via email to