------- Comment #49 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-23 19:00 ------- To fix this completely, a little bit more work is required to check what should be done for nanl(), which is not handled by current patch. (I don't have time to look into it.) For more information, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg01035.html
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |org |dot org Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Known to fail|4.2.0 4.3.0 4.4.0 |4.2.0 4.3.0 Known to work| |4.4.0 Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25477