------- Comment #5 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-02-20 23:39 ------- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: FAIL: abi_check
OK, if it really is just inlining decision difference then we are fine. I guess we can either update symbol list or mark always_inline > because of a changing inlining decision. My concern, however, is whether it's > ok not to inline such a tiny function (fyi, the function is defined in > basic_ios.h all the uses are in fstream.tcc). First blush, I don't think it's > ok... I can look into the reason why it is not getting inlined. It would help to have preprocessed testcase as I am travelling now :) Honza -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35262
