------- Comment #1 from dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-14 21:38 ------- This code is actually ill-formed. The problem is here:
bind(h, forward<Args...>(args...)) For N arguments, the second argument expands to: bind(h, forward<Args1, Args2, ..., ArgsN>(args1, args2, ..., argsN)) However, that's ill-formed because forward() accepts one template argument and one function argument. We should have given a better error message when we try to instantiate it with 0 arguments (instead, we crash). The intent of the example is for the second argument to expand into "N" different arguments: bind(h, forward<Args1>(args1), forward<Args2>(args2), ..., forward<ArgsN>(argsN>) That can be expressed like so: bind(h, forward<Args>(args)...) With that change, and replacing "h" (a function) with "c" (the Callable function object given to this function), this program runs. Here is a simpler test case that produces the same compile-time failure without including any C++0x headers: template<typename _Tp> inline _Tp&& forward(_Tp&& __t) { return __t; } void f(...); template<typename... Args> void g(Args&&... args) { f(forward<Args...>(args...)); } void h() { g(); } -- dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |ice-on-invalid-code Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-02-14 21:38:40 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35147