------- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-02-14 10:14 ------- Subject: Re: array constants after inlining and "staticification"
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, tbptbp at gmail dot com wrote: > ------- Comment #4 from tbptbp at gmail dot com 2008-02-14 10:02 ------- > Hmm. If i correctly understand what you're saying, *cough*, ldexp should be > immune to this missed-folding-because-a-builtin-isn't-recognized-as-such; but yes > in the original code that lead to PR34774 there's nothing but ldexp, yet > *some* > of them occur at runtime under some weird conditions. I'd like to see a testcase for this as this would be a bug ;) Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34864
